yeuimu
6c61a4e871
- Debian-based api image (bookworm-slim), docker/debian mirrors, prisma binaryTargets for openssl 3.0 - nginx: admin SPA under /admin, TLS via acme.sh (ZeroSSL) + auto-renewal cron, http->https redirect - prisma: add origin_goods.delisted migration, sync missing schema (good_image/tag_font_color/good_tags), fix users.createdAt Timestamptz - api: CORS wildcard reflection, helmet CORP cross-origin, price backfill in persistProductDetail, categoryIcon ancestor fallback, mediaByColor per-color gallery in public goods detail - admin: /admin base path (vite + router) - import-data.mjs: udt_name casting, serial sequence advance fix
50 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# Spec Document Reviewer Prompt Template
|
|
|
|
Use this template when dispatching a spec document reviewer subagent.
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Verify the spec is complete, consistent, and ready for implementation planning.
|
|
|
|
**Dispatch after:** Spec document is written to docs/superpowers/specs/
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Task tool (general-purpose):
|
|
description: "Review spec document"
|
|
prompt: |
|
|
You are a spec document reviewer. Verify this spec is complete and ready for planning.
|
|
|
|
**Spec to review:** [SPEC_FILE_PATH]
|
|
|
|
## What to Check
|
|
|
|
| Category | What to Look For |
|
|
|----------|------------------|
|
|
| Completeness | TODOs, placeholders, "TBD", incomplete sections |
|
|
| Consistency | Internal contradictions, conflicting requirements |
|
|
| Clarity | Requirements ambiguous enough to cause someone to build the wrong thing |
|
|
| Scope | Focused enough for a single plan — not covering multiple independent subsystems |
|
|
| YAGNI | Unrequested features, over-engineering |
|
|
|
|
## Calibration
|
|
|
|
**Only flag issues that would cause real problems during implementation planning.**
|
|
A missing section, a contradiction, or a requirement so ambiguous it could be
|
|
interpreted two different ways — those are issues. Minor wording improvements,
|
|
stylistic preferences, and "sections less detailed than others" are not.
|
|
|
|
Approve unless there are serious gaps that would lead to a flawed plan.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
## Spec Review
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Approved | Issues Found
|
|
|
|
**Issues (if any):**
|
|
- [Section X]: [specific issue] - [why it matters for planning]
|
|
|
|
**Recommendations (advisory, do not block approval):**
|
|
- [suggestions for improvement]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Reviewer returns:** Status, Issues (if any), Recommendations
|